MY PHOTOS, FÉNYKÉP FELVÉTELEIM

PHOTOS: Hungarian events, and other shots
FOTÓK: Magyar Események, és más felvételek:

Most of my pictures are displayed on http://Webshots.Com and you will find my Pictures and/or Albums by searching under : Leslie_Eloed

Legtöbb képem megtalálható a Http://Webshots.Com címen. Albumjaim és/vagy Képeim a keresőben Leslie_Eloed keresőszóra találhatóak.

=========================================

6.09.2007

New film about the 1956 Hungarian Revolution

TORN FROM THE FLAG

NEWSLETTER – MAY 2007

“A nation that is capable of limitless sacrifice is capable of rising to limitless heights. The greater the sacrifice, the greater the progress.”
Mahatma Gandhi

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This progress report is to update you on the latest developments regarding the full-length documentary film project Torn from the Flag, about the fall of communism and the significant global effects of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution and Freedom Fight.

I'm thrilled to announce that, after 8½ years of hard work, we have completed the film! It was a process that was sometimes extremely joyous and sometimes very hard, but always worth it.

Before completion, we had a small, closed preview screening and we got very positive feedback: 91% of the audience thought the film was “Excellent” or “Very Good.” 89% thought it was “Highly Engaging” or “Engaging.” And 92% would “Highly Recommend” or “Recommend” the film to their friends. So, the polls are very promising. As mentioned before, we also sent off the film to several historians to make sure that the film has no historical inaccuracies. We sent it off to the experts at the Cold War Institute at Harvard University and at the 1956 Institute. We got the following feedback: “Perhaps the best documentary ever made on 1956”; “a really great movie on 1956”; “the documentary is excellent” and “exceptionally well-made and even stirring.” So we are very excited about sharing it with you, our donors and supporters, and about showing it to the general public.

We also have completed our beautiful new film poster! Our graphic designer Chris Kirk worked wonders and we are very happy with it.

There are a few things that we will still need before we are able to release the film into the world. As explained in detail in our last newsletter, we are still seeking a distributor for the film, and one of the strategies we are employing for that is submitting to film festivals; therefore we still need your sponsorship for our participation in film festivals. Every film festival has various fees/expenses; the budget did not include this, as the budget is only for making the film. Expenses that need to be covered are:

· Festival Submission Fees (average: $40 - $200)

· Publicity materials--if you are in the printing business, you can help by printing our materials.

· Travel expenses to/from festivals, room and board--donating airline miles is one way you can help with this.

Secondly, the requirements set by the Academy for a film to be eligible to be considered for the Oscar® were made much more difficult to meet this year than previously: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/32569. Qualifying has basically become a game for the financially privileged and the filmmakers need your help. Please participate in the film being eligible to be considered for the Oscar®! For this, we need to hold screenings of the film and we are urgently seeking communities in North America that would be willing to host screenings and fill the seats. This, too, was explained in fuller detail in our January newsletter: "The first step to sponsoring an Academy-required screening in your community is to let us know you are interested; we will then give you the exact parameters required by the Academy."

If you can't help with the screenings themselves, please send a tax-deductible donation for this purpose.

U.S. taxpayers: If your donation is greater than $5,000, please write your check payable to the Hungarian American Coalition. If your donation is less than $5000, kindly write your check payable to the International Documentary Association. In either case, please write the words "Torn from the Flag" in the memo section, and mail the check to:

1626 North Wilcox Avenue #393
Hollywood, CA 90028
Attention: Klaudia Kovacs, Producer/Director

The Hungarian American Coalition or the International Documentary Association will send you a receipt within 30 days so that you may use your gift as a tax deduction. Additional financial opportunities are still available.

It's important to note that every film has a different distribution and release plan, and therefore no film's plan can be compared to another's. I mention this because the community has experience with some documentary films; however, no two films are released at the same speed or in the same way. In general, the higher-profile a film is, the more time and preparation distribution and release involve.

Meanwhile, if you cannot wait and would like a small taste of the film, the trailer is posted on YouTube.com. It has now been viewed 1,611 times and "favorited" 22 times. Viewers rate it at four stars. Please tell your friends about it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwAYVnuBpfw

Thank you to the Hungarian Veterans' Association of Calgary for their donation this quarter, and to the Hungarian American Coalition for their ongoing support.

Thank you also to Tom Ormeny, Dennis Fredricks and Alex Veadov for their kind help this quarter. Last, but not least, thank you to Csaba Hrotko, Zoltan Hrotko and Paul Stevenson for their voiceover acting services.

Thank you for your continuing interest in and support of this project. Approximately 2000 individuals and organizations helped in some way to make this film a reality. Some of you have been there since the beginning 8½ years ago, and some of you came on more recently; either way, your support has made this film possible and we are truly thankful. I would like to point out that this level of collaboration has never happened before in the North American Hungarian immigrant community: we can be very proud of ourselves as a community for coming together in this way. We are thankful, as well, for those non-Hungarians who were kind enough to help this special film. All the donors who ever gave any amount of money or services, excepting those who requested to remain anonymous, were included in the rolling credits at the end of the film.

Please let us know if you have changed your email address, so that we can keep you informed about screenings and the premiere! And let your friends and family know about this community project: ask them to send us their email address, so that they can be informed of our screenings too.

We are so looking forward to sharing our film with you!

Gratefully yours,

Klaudia Kovacs

http://www.klaudiainc.com

klaudiakovacs@msn.com

# end

„Az én ötvenhatom”


„Az én ötvenhatom"
Európai parlamenti képviselők emlékeznek a magyar forradalomra
Megjelent: Magyar Nemzet Online - MNO

2007. június 8. 20:28

Schmitt Pál és Szájer József mutatta be péntek délután a Centrál Kávéházban "Az én ötvenhatom" című könyvet. A kötet az európai parlamenti képviselők szemszögéből vizsgálja a forradalmat.

A Fidesz által kezdeményezett, Brüsszelben és Stasbourgban megrendezett „1956-2006" magyar év záróaktusának tekinthető kötet az Európai Parlamentre koncentrál, a benne megszólaló képviselők az 56-os forradalomról mondják el emlékeit és benyomásaikat. Schmitt Pál az emlékévvel kapcsolatosan arra hívta fel a figyelmet, céljuk az volt, hogy az európaiak minél jobban ismerjék meg azt a forradalmat, ami előzménye volt a későbbi csodálatos változásoknak. Számos kiállítás és előadás mellett a kötet záró dokumentuma az évnek – jegyezte meg Schmitt.

Az interjúk között megtalálható a brit liberális Bill Newton Dunn-nal készített beszélgetés is, aki magyar feleségével 1956 révén ismerkedett meg, illetve fellelhetőek az Európai Parlament volt és jelenlegi elnökének 56-os emlékei, továbbá a hírességek közül Bronislaw Geremek, Vytautas Landsbergis, Michel Rocard és Elmar Brok is megosztotta élményeit a kötet szerkesztőivel.

-Az 56-os magyar év rendezvénysorozat egy misszióba illeszkedett- húzta alá Szájer József, kiemelve: Európa újraegyesítése nem valósulhat meg addig, amíg nem egyesítjük a történelmeinket is. Mint fogalmazott, Nyugat-Európának világosan tudomást kell vennie arról, hogy Európának ezen a részén a kommunizmus öröksége hosszan tartó árnyékot vet a jövőre. Rámutatott arra is, Európa eddig nem igazán fordított kellő figyelmet a kontinens ezen részére.
-Ezeknek a rendszereknek az egyértelmű elítélésére és a kommunizmus áldozatainak megbecsülésére van szükség - jegyezte meg Szájer, hozzáfűzve: ezért is avattak Bibó István-portrét a magyar európai képviselők folyosóján.
# end

6.08.2007

Remembering November 4, 1956


Remembering November 4, 1956.
By Leslie T Eloed

Fifty years ago ten glorious days of Hungarian Freedom were drowned in blood on the streets of Budapest. On this fortieth anniversary I would like to bring to all of you freedom-loving fellow American Citizen, a message . . . My thoughts and feelings put so well into words by George Putnam on the tenth anniversary of the October 23, 1956 Hungarian Uprising.

In his speech Mr. Putnam said: "It could happen here".
Today I feel: it did happened here, it is happening here. It took only one generation, thirty years since this speech. Are the "Liberals" the flag-bearers? I most certainly feel, that the answer to this question is a very firm: yes.

Mr. George Putnam was guest speaker at the tenths anniversary Hungarian Commemoration in the Santa Monica Auditorium. The following day I wrote Mr. Putnam requesting a copy of his speech. I quote from my letter to him:

"You and I both know so well the dangers of Communism, therefore I would appreciate the opportunity to copy and distribute your speech . . . (preferably before election day.) It is of great importance to the Hungarian people who know the dangers, that the American people be warned of the insidiousness of Socialism and of the havoc that can be wreaked by "compromise." Many of the trusting people with whom I speak in the course of my work feel that "peace at any price" and the ostrich approach will make everything alright . . . but the time is fast coming when a takeover from within can be made so easily because of this trust or ignorance or both, that it will afford too good a chance for the Communists to pass up."

And so it is now, that I find that under a "democratic" liberal government the United States resembles more an internationally controlled system, where the vocal minority rules and under the guise of "politically correct" slogans is selling us down the river, destroy the moral fiber, attack the churches and the faith in God, --just as the Communists did in the captive nations -- basic values this country was founded upon and stated in the Constitution. Communism in Hungary presented itself as a social-caring government, professed the principle of democratic centralism as well as the ideology of Godless Materialism. Think about it. What do we have here today?

So here is that thirty year old speech, more relevant today then at any other time in the history of the United States, on the eve of yet another election.
* * *
Santa Monica, October 23, 1966 California

IT COULD HAPPEN HERE
.
by George Putnam

Thank you, Dr. András Pogány. It is with deep humility and gratification that I accept this great honor from the Hungarian Freedom Fighters.

Ten years ago, a prominent Hungarian Bishop went to radio Budapest and taking the microphone in his hands, appealed to the whole free world in these words:
"I ask you, in the name of Jesus Christ, to help us!"

Then, there was silence -- the horrible silence that told the world that Hungary's cry for freedom had been choked out by the bloody grip of Communism.

America should have hung her head in shame. The brave Hungarian people believed we would help -- that all they needed do was show their willingness to fight and we would spring to their aid. But we failed them in their hour of greatest need.

Thousands lay dead in the "Battle of Budapest." They fought our fight as well as their own -- the fight for lasting freedom.

The brave Hungarian people called for a black New Year's Eve in defiance of the Red Russians -- and in memory of the Hungarian dead. Hungarians turned out the lights early, and went to bed in silence that January1st, 1957. It was a period of national mourning, with food scarce, factories idle, production at a standstill. The coalmines, backbone of the Hungarian economy, worked at the barest minimum.

Fifty thousand Hungarians lay dead in makeshift graves. The stench of death was everywhere -- the terrible price paid by the Hungarian people in their battle for freedom.

But there where others -- thousands of them -- who fled the brutality of the Communists. We sent a cameraman to the scene to interview and talk with these brave Hungarian families who fled Communist suppression -- who reached out to us in America for a chance to live in peace.

My cameraman cabled from Munich:

"If you want to see real raw courage, look into the faces of these wonderful Hungarian people with whom I've been talking. Many of them have everything they own wrapped in a few handkerchiefs. All they ask is a chance to go to work and begin their lives all over again in a free land. Meet them. Greet them with love. They are a great people -- and they've been through hell."

And they came to us, from the cities, the farms, the rural communities -- they came by the thousands -- the old, the young, and those between -- all with one thing in common -- searching for a new home away from the brutality and suppression they had known under the Communists. A home of freedom and opportunity, with the wish that their young might grow up in a land that affords freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from fear, and freedom from want.

Our American boys away from their own families and homes, demonstrated to those freedom-seeking Hungarians the true spirit and meaning of the American Christmas. They were served a Christmas dinner with all the trimmings in Munich, Germany.

And then, the President of the United States instituted "Operation Safe Haven" (the United States Airlift of Hungarian refugees.) Thousands upon thousands of Hungarian people were flown to the United States. And realizing the desperate plight of these brave Hungarian people, we rolled up our sleeves and pitched in to find homes and jobs for hundreds of Hungarian refugees and their families. Many of us here this evening helped give those brave Hungarian people the will and the wherewithal to go forward. And in so doing, we waged our own personal war against Communism -- and reaffirmed our faith in the American way.Time Magazine honored the dedicated men and women who rebelled against Communism in Hungary, by naming as Man of the Year, "The Hungarian Freedom Fighter". People whose valiant struggle served as a high point in the free world's battle against the scourge of Communism!

This reporter was proud to receive one thousand three hundred fifty two verified offers of employment in Southern California for these Hungarian patriots. These efforts brought a commendation from the President of the United States.

Those who escaped were the fortunate ones. It is those who remained behind who suffered the wrath of the Communists. Mass trials were conducted. And in those trials, 2,500 Freedom Fighters were sentenced to death. Untold thousands were doomed to exile, were sent to Siberian labor camps, were imprisoned and suffered other inhumanities -- with or without trial.

And those who went to their graves seemed to utter this warning:

"You, who are yet free, must behold the awful truth -- there is no compromise possible with Communism. Unless it is overcome and vanquished, it will also destroy you."
These honored dead gave their lives. I take them at their word!

But today, the Russian leaders shout for the entire world to hear that the United States and its people are cutthroats and murderers, accusing us of all manner of things, going back to the two atomic bombs dropped by us to end World war Two.
It was in 1959 that our Congress recognized the desire of millions of people, enslaved by Communism, to regain liberty and independence. And thus Congress enacted the "Captive Nations Resolution". Congress found that the imperialist policies of the Kremlin led to the subjugation of the national independence of eighteen European nations!

There were high-flown words in that Congressional Resolution!

"It is fitting for the United States to make clear to the peoples of those Captive Nations that we share their aspirations for the recovery of their freedom and independence. It is imperative that we act to proclaim "Captive Nations Week" because of the continuing need to direct attention to the light of the peoples under the heavy yoke of Communism."

Yes, high sounding words!

The world moves on rapidly for those who are free. But time drags slowly, heavily, with the oppressed. There always is a hue and cry from without when a nation is crushed by a bloody invader. But soon the protests give way to murmur, and international listlessness takes over, as man returns to his daily existence. And soon the freedom and the cause of freedom of the oppressed nation becomes a matter approaching shameful indifference.We shed tears for a moment, tears for the oppressed. But then we hurry off to the football game, or fiddle with the television set. We call it "relaxation". Yet all too often it is a tragic escape from reality.Tonight, I ask you to think of the people behind the Iron Curtain -- those who barely have enough to eat -- whose land and homes and possessions have been stolen from them in the name of Communism.Think of the unsmiling faces of the tragic people of the Captive Nations. The sad faces of those people, and these flags representing them, bear mute testimony to the engulfing hopelessness brought into their lives by the scourge of Communism.

Hear the voices of those enslaved people as they cry out to us tonight. Hear their anguished cries for help, America -- and for the freedom we take for granted. They know how fortunate we are, even if some of us do not. They know the pitfalls -- the dangers -- and they know it could happen here!Yes, it can happen in our beloved America, where the head of the Communist Party in the United States is allowed to parade up and down the land and across our college campuses, and loudly proclaim:"I dream of the hour when the last Congressman is strangled to death on the guts of the last preacher. And since the Christians seem to love to sing about blood, why not give them a little of it. Slit the throats of their children and drag them over the mourners' bench and the pulpit, and allow them to drown in their own blood. And then see whether they enjoy singing hymns." On one twelve day speaking tour, Gus Hall, the person who spoke those words, delivered 37 speeches, most of them on University campuses.

Yes, it can happen here, where Benjamin Davis, a Harvard graduate and top ranking Communist, convicted for conspiring to overthrow our government, is greeted by the Harvard Law School Dean as follows:
"I throughly accept you as an American," and goes on to tell 600 students present that "Benjamin Davis", the Communist, "must be respected for his conviction and his determination."
And yes, it can happen here, America -- if we continue to allow left wing speakers to tell our fifth and sixth grade students that the war in Vietnam is an "unjust war", and that the United States is guilty of aggression!

It was János Kádár who said:

"Everyone who is not against the Communists is with them."

And don't be confused as to the difference between Communism and Socialism.
The two are bedfellows. Winston Churchill called Socialism:

"The philosophy of failure and the gospel of envy."

Helen Wood Birnie, a Communist who served the F.B.I., and since has distinguished herself as a great American, has said:

"The difference between Socialism and Communism is a very simple one. It is the difference between seduction and rape."

The enemy of the free world, the enemy of America, is not the American Legion, or the Veterans of Foreign Wars, or the Sons or Daughters of the American Revolution, or the John Birch Society. The threat to us now is Communism!
Communism is not only a disease of poverty and chaos -- Communism is a disease of the mind. And anyone who calls the John Birch Society a greater threat to California and America than Communism suffers from a diseased mind.

One who escaped to the United States tells us: the same conditions exist in America today that preceded the downfall of his country. He says:

"Everybody took for granted, because we were a freedom-loving people, we would never lose freedom. We paid little attention to pro-Communists, organized and infiltrated into everything in our land . . . Too busy with business, professions, sports, movies, to realize the sad price for our neglect."

"One morning fate came upon us like a shot out of hell. We were helpless. Machine guns lined our streets. The government, army, schools, communications -- everything -- taken over by the Communists during the night, and while we slept."

Tonight, as the Communists so loudly proclaim that we are cutthroats and murderers, let us remind the Russian Communists that they conducted a genocide that took six t seven million lives -- that they engineered the systematic starvation of millions of Ukrainians -- that they uprooted the Catholic Church and destroyed the Synagogues -- that they are the enemies of the Christian or the Jew, or anyone who believes in God -- that they killed 50,000 Hungarians during the Hungarian revolt.

But it has not stopped. The Communists today are torturing, terrorizing, and killing those who stand in their way -- those who dare to raise a hand in defense of freedom and liberty.There is no difference between these crimes against humanity today in Vietnam, and those by the Nazis in World War Two. It is happening NOW.

Yet, there are those who say we must "live with, coexist with" Communism -- while our brothers remain in slavery.

Tonight, as I drove to this gathering, I heard a report on the radio concerning "improved conditions" in Hungary on this 10th Anniversary. But my friends, there is no political change in Eastern Europe, or elsewhere in the Communist world. And our brothers remain enslaved by Communism.

Yet, we are encouraged to increase our contacts with the Communists, our trade with them, and to extend long-term credit to Communist dominated nations -- while Communist bullets kill our men in Vietnam.Each of our leaders, in turn, has believed that he had some unique or peculiar talent with which to deal with the Communists. But each has failed!

So now it is time to tell the world we are willing to discuss outstanding issues with the Communists only after they have set our brothers free. And that we are only beginning with the battle for Vietnam -- that we will not rest until we have set all people and their nations free!

It is time this nation and its leaders begin to act for the very survival of America. It is time we cast aside criticism and act forcefully in solving our problems. If we continue to submit to "popularity polls" and live by "images", we will never be able to use our power effectively to back our diplomacy.The world still respects strength. We appear to lack the will to use it. Power can be a deterrent to Communist expansion. But the power must be real, and it must come from a position of strength and determination. The ancient Chinese had a phrase for it:

"Use power to curb power."

We have the power. All we need is the will to use it. We have the cause, and history will prove us right -- if only we will act! We are engaged in a real war that has got to be fought and won!Listen America, to the voices, living and dead, of those brave men and women of -- Albania -- Armenia -- Azerbaijan -- Bulgaria -- Cuba -- Cossackia -- Czechoslovakia -- East Germany -- Estonia -- Georgia -- Hungary -- Idel-Ural -- Latvia -- Lithuania -- Mainland China -- Mongolia -- North Korea -- North Vietnam -- Poland -- Rumania -- The Ukraine -- Tibet -- Turkistan -- White Ruthenia -- Yugoslavia -- and others.Yet those brave people, who have lost their freedom, know that the choice is between God and Godlessness -- freedom and slavery -- life or death.

Listen to their voices, America -- and you will act. They cry out to us!

Do we hear their voices tonight?

# end

Communists in "Democratic" Clothing

THE READER’S DIGEST JUNE 1976 pages 147 through 151

FORTUNE (MARCH •76), C 1976 BY TIME INC., TIME & LIFE BLDG., ROCKEFELLER CENTER. NEWYORK. N.Y. 10020

Condensed from FORTUNE: DANIEL SELIGMAN Communists in "Democratic" Clothing

Some of the largest communist parties in the industrialized world say they believe in civil liberties, free elections, and a multiparty system. Do they mean it?

SOON Americans may be focusing hard on a question that once would have seemed very peculiar.
Can communists be democrats?

Only a few years ago, the answer would have been: no, obviously not. Today it isn't obvious at all. A number of communist parties in the advanced industrial countries now claim to be democratic. They say that they are committed to a multi-party system in which civil liberties and cultural freedom would be guaranteed. They say that they have no interest in bringing anything like the Soviet version of communism to the West.

Whether they mean what they say is a matter of considerable significance. Communists talking about democracy have serious prospects of entering the governments of Italy and France during the next couple of years, and interesting longer-run prospects in Spain (where the party is now outlawed) and Japan. If even one of these four countries were governed by communists, the political map of the world would surely be transformed in ways that Americans could not ignore. The nature of the transformation is a matter of controversy. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, who is skeptical about the communists' profession of democratic beliefs, has argued that bringing their parties into government would undermine the free world's unity and resolve. On the other hand, those who believe that the "democratic" communists really mean it sometimes argue that their participation in the democratic process would principally threaten Soviet interests. It is a real question whether the regimes of Eastern Europe could survive the spectacle of communists entering a democratic government and later retiring from office after being defeated in a free election.

The desirability of bringing communists into government involves economics as well as politics. In principle, at least, they might turn out to be truly democratic, independent of the Russians, even willing to support NATO and the European Community—and still be a disaster for the West. What would remain of the market system in any country where "democratic" communists came to power? They are generally committed to preserve a mixture of public and private enterprise, and they are certainly not emphasizing plans for any major nationalization of industry. Still, their strident anddemagogic rhetoric about the menace of multi-national corporations does not sound encouraging.

A Gigantic Hoax? It seems reasonable to ask whether communists talking about democracy aren't simply engaged in a gigantic hoax, hoping that the talk will bring them to power but planning to revert to their normal totalitarian practices after achieving it. There is certainly a prima facie case for regarding totalitarianism as the norm. Seventeen countries have gone communist over the years, from the Soviet Union in November 1917, to Laos in December 1975. There is today no political opposition or cultural freedom in any of the 17.

There is another reason to be skeptical. Over the years, communists have been flagrant liars. And their doctrine has long proclaimed that any tactics are morally permissible in the war against the bourgeoisie. Lenin was amazingly explicit about this. He said that the true revolutionaries were those willing "to resort to all sorts of stratagems, artifices, illegal methods, to evasions and subterfuges."

But the most compelling reason for skepticism lies elsewhere—in the ambiguous relationship between the democratically oriented communist parties and the Soviet Union. While the party leaders frequently criticize the Russians, and reject their guidance on many issues of common concern, the parties nevertheless insist on their underlying solidarity with the Soviet Union, as members of "the socialist camp." When a professed democrat says he' belongs to a "camp" that condones totalitarians, it is natural to wonder about the depth of his commitment to democracy.

At the same time, it would be foolish to deny the possibility of democratic communism. After Nikita Khrushchev's February 1956 "secret speech," which shattered forever the mystique of Stalinism, the parties outside the Soviet sphere were free to create their own versions of communism. Their ideologies do not appear to represent an insuperable difficulty to the creation of democratic versions. In fact, communists would appear to have some powerful incentives for moving toward democratic positions. It has become fairly obvious in the last few years that the most successful communist parties—those that have attracted the most members and won the most votes—are precisely those that have moved the furthest away from Stalinism.

Wooing the Voters. The Italian party, which was first and most emphatic in proclaiming its commitment to democracy, is also the largest in the West, with 1.7 million members. In regional elections last June, the party won a third of the total vote; in electoral support it is now generally considered the equal of the Christian Democrats, who have ruled Italy all through the postwar years. The communists' secretary-general Enrico Berlinguer was voted the "most trusted" of all Italian politicians in a poll taken last year.

Meanwhile, the communist parties that sound as though they are still selling the Soviet version of communism (e.g., the U.S. and Danish parties) tend to be small and isolated sects. Thus there is a growing incentive for communists to behave like democrats.

To a considerable extent, the Italian communist party is a model for the other "democratic" communists. It has achieved this status, not only because of its electoral triumphs, but also because of a kind of intellectual pre-eminence in the communist world. The Italian communists have signed formal declarations with communist parties in other West European countries committing them to democratic principles. A declaration signed by Berlinguer and Spanish communist leader Santiago Carrillo last July proclaimed:

"Socialism can only arise in our countries through the development and full achievement of democracy. This has at its base the affirmation of the values of personal and collective freedom and the guarantee of the principles of the separation between church and state, of freedom of speech, of the plurality of parties and the open dialogue between them, of the liberty of expression in culture, in art, and in science."

Do the Italian communists mean it? Can one possibly accept the democratic professions of those who voluntarily ally themselves with the rulers of a totalitarian society like the Soviet Union?

"Democratic Centralism." Antonio Giolitti, a former communist who is now a prominent socialist member of the Italian parliament, says that he does not doubt Berlinguer's own sincerity when he talks about democracy. But Leninist patterns of thought are so deeply ingrained in the political behavior of many communists that it would be imprudent to trust them, he fears. "I think of this hypothesis," said Giolitti recently. "The communists form a government. They take power. There is much debate and uncertainty over what they will do. Businessmen begin to send their capital abroad. Other parties demonstrate against the communists and perhaps there is some violence on both sides. What will the communists do in this situation? I am not sure—but I worry that their instinct will be to limit the freedom of others and to do anything that will enable them to avoid surrendering power."

Some critics of the Italian communist party believe that its commitment to democracy is suspect on still another count. The Italian party—and, it would appear, every other communist party in the world—believes in "democratic centralism." In principle, this doctrine permits local cells and sections to discuss all questions confronting the party and to elect delegates to the policy-making conventions. Once policy is set, however, "democratic centralism" requires all members to support it in every detail; there can be no deviations; no factions, no journals expressing dissident ideas. The penalty for factionalism is frequently expulsion from the party.

The Italian communists have often expelled their own dissidents, and there is no doubt that the threat of expulsion works to inhibit free speech within the party. This is all quite different from the tradition of democratic socialist (and, for that matter, conservative) parties, in which the standard assumption is that every member will have the right to maintain his beliefs and to argue them indefinitely. That is why a party governed by the rules of "democratic centralism" doesn't really look democratic to critics like Leopold Labedz, editor of the London-based quarterly Survey. "If they really are converted to democracy," he asks, "why do they need this monolithic party? If they really believe in freedom for ideas, why do they begin by suppressing ideas inside their own party?"

Minimums for Trust. The electoral successes of the Italian communists have had a profound effect on the French communist party, which was much slower to shake off the heritage of Stalinism and is still more rigid and dogmatic in its approach to current issues. But the spectacle of an Italian communist party pushing a democratic line and growing steadily stronger, while the French clung to their Stalinist past and grew weaker, provided a convincing case for an overhaul in France.

It would appear that the decision for change was made some time last fall. In November, party leader Georges Marchais joined with Berlinguer in issuing a declaration of principles that committed both to a vigorous defensé of democracy. The declaration held that "all freedom resulting from the great bourgeois democratic revolutions should be guaranteed and furthered."

But will any communist party ever be credible in talking about its conversion to democracy ? Given the fantastic changes that have already taken place in the world of communism, it seems wrong to rule out the possibility. Some of the parties may ultimately do what has to be done to gain credibility. At a minimum, that means two changes. First, they must unambiguously abandon solidarity with totalitarians. Second, they must stop running their parties by the rules of "democratic centralism."

Those changes would presumably not come easy to the communists, but there is no reason why noncommunists should settle for less. In their present form, the parties would appear to justify the concerns of those who want to keep them out of government. They represent too great a risk. #end

6.07.2007

Remembering Trianon

AHF Remembering Trianon on its 87th Anniversary
For full text and pictures:


June 4, 2007 The 87th Anniversary of Trianon:
"Trianon: Tragedy, Dissolution, and Remedy." Frank Koszorus, Jr. and the AHF International Relations Committee release essay on treaty's 87th anniversary.


"...Ostensibly in the name of national self-determination, the Treaty dismembered the thousand-year-old Kingdom of Hungary, a self-contained, geographically and economically coherent and durable formation in the Carpathian Basin and boasting the longest lasting historical borders in Europe. It was imposed on Hungary without any negotiation by vengeful leaders who were ignorant or ignored the region’s history, and mercilessly tore that country apart. By drawing artificial borders in gross violation of the ethnic principle, it also transferred over three million indigenous ethnic Hungarians and over 70% of the country's territory to foreign rule.

Following the war to make the "world safe for democracy," the Treaty even denied the affected populations the right to choose under whose sovereignty they would live. Only the city of Sopron in western Hungary was allowed a plebiscite to decide its future, and it opted by a large margin to remain in Hungary.

Although the peacemakers included provisions for the protection of minorities in various international instruments they insisted the successor states sign, the latter generally ignored their promises and the individual and minority rights of ethnic Hungarians were violated

The essay includes selected statements relating to some of these issues that shed light on the context, attitudes and practices that affected Hungarians eighty-seven years ago and which still impact and to some extent poison the region, as evidenced by the Successor States’ refusal to grant their Hungarian historical communities the right to autonomy.

The last excerpt is another solution for a tragedy that affected the entire region."

"Trianon Binds No One except Hungarians," AHF Issues Statement on the 86th Anniversary of the Trianon Tragedy. Hungarian American communities join in protest. AHF's Assoc. President Frank Koszorus, Jr., writes, "Two of the new states cobbled together by the victorious Entente “peacemakers” at Versailles ceased to exist years ago, and even part (Moldova) of the third successor state succeeded to gain its independence it never had before. Ironically, the winds of change that swept through the region and rearranged the old Cordon Stalinaire after 1989, left untouched the very people who have suffered the most under a punitive treaty – the thousand plus year old indigenous Hungarian communities living under the rule of states that are mostly different from those stipulated at Trianon 86 years ago.

Even as Montenegro declares its independence and Kosovo’s status remains on the front burner, Budapest appears content to sit on the sidelines and conspicuously refrains from espousing the democratically expressed aspirations of autochthonous Hungarian minorities for autonomy in Vojvodina, Transylvania, Slovakia and Karpatalja (Ruthenia)."

About the Treaty One thousand years of nation building successfully delineated groups based on culture, religion and other attributes to create the countries with which we are so familiar. While some Western European nations would continue power struggles and princely battles and civil wars, Hungary was a peaceful multi-ethnic state for those 1000 years and her borders were unchanged. Until 1920...

The Treaty of Trianon in 1920... In the aftermath of WWI, was extremely harsh on Hungary and unjustifiably one-sided. The resulting "treaty" lost Hungary an unprecedented 2/3 of her territory, and 1/2 of her total population or 1/3 of her Hungarian-speaking population. Add to this the loss of up to 90% of vast natural resources, industry, railways, and other infrastructure. This was done to a nation whose borders were established over a thousand years earlier (896 A.D.) and one who, as the "Saviors of Christianity," lost millions of lives defending the rest of Europe from numerous invasions from the likes of the Mongolian Tatars and the Ottoman Turks.

Hungary, along with Germany and Austria, experienced rapid economic expansion during the latter part of the 19th century and into the 20th. This challenge alarmed France and Russia. Each needed a way to stave off German-Hungarian economic competition. With the advent of WWI, France had her chance and began fostering anti-Hungarian sentiment among non-Magyar speaking Hungarian nationals. It is important to note that for over a thousand years, Hungary never experienced ethnic civil war. France, eager to weaken Hungary, offered to reward those nations and groups that assisted them in the war with large pieces of territory. The "Little Entente" of Rumania (who switched sides in the last minute), Czechoslovakia, and Serbia took that opportunity and got very lucky. The United States has never ratified this treaty. At the time President Wilson said: “The proposal to dismember Hungary is absurd” and later Sir Winston Churchill said: “Ancient poets and theologians could not imagine such suffering, which Trianon brought to the innocent.” We are sad to report that he was right.
The French, despite American protests and calls for plebiscites, sent their troops to Northern Hungary in violation of the cease fire, and then pushed through the Treaty of Versailles (Trianon).

Although Rumania, herself created only in 1862, switched to the French side almost at the very end of the war, she gained all of Transylvania and majority of the Banat, but claimed the river Tisza.

The Czechs were awarded all of Northern Hungary (now Slovakia), despite equal numbers of Hungarians and Slovaks in the region, to create Czechoslovakia.

The Serbs got Southern Hungary (Vojvodina) and Croatia (confederated with Hungary for 700 years) to create the unlikely "Yugoslavia," which, like Czechoslovakia, effectively, no longer exists.

Perhaps most amazingly, the Austrians who were responsible for getting Hungary into the war in the first place, got Western Hungary (Burgenland).

The dictators in these successor states began to foster nationalism and teach a less-than-accurate history to help bring legitimacy to their regimes. These claims are based on some seriously unfortunate state propaganda-cum-history about an ancient Roman province called Dacia. In Rumania, this revised history, accelerated by Ceausescu, has become the accepted state historical doctrine even today, making the process of reconciliation much more difficult.

In the newly formed Czechoslovakia, Eduard Benes and his infamous "Benes Decrees" forcibly expelled tens of thousands of Hungarians and confiscated personal and church properties. See the additional steps the Slovak Government has more recently taken against the Hungarian minority.

AHF's effort to guarantee anew the rights of the Hungarian "minorities" continues. Though the United States recommended a slightly more liberal approach in regards to Hungary, it did not prevail. The "self-determination of the nationalities" posited by President Woodrow Wilson resulted in only one plebiscite in Sopron, in Western Hungary. The vote was overwhelmingly pro-Hungarian and Sopron remained within the new borders.

Oddly enough, although Austria was also a loser in the war, she also received a part of Hungary, and Sopron became a border city.
The dismemberment and instability brought economic collapse and governmental crisis. The Rumanians, also in defiance of the armistice agreement with their new-found French allies, took advantage of the turmoil in Hungary and moved troops into the defenseless nation and occupied Budapest and beyond. To this day, the Greater Rumania Party and others in Rumania still claim territory that includes the river Tisza and even Budapest.

A short-communist takeover and then an inept republican government finally gave way to Royalist Admiral Miklos Horthy who took over as "Regent" of Hungary and brought some stability back to the country. The new government got to work on trying to revise the unjust treaty. Sadly, the US with its growing isolationist stance, pulled out of the League of Nations and Western Europe wanted no part in re-opening the case. France was focused on making sure Germany was punished.

The Hungarians got a sympathetic ear from only Italy and Germany. This tragic alliance initially gained Hungary part of her northern territory from Czechoslovakia and Northern Transylvania from Rumania.

But this alliance would only plunge her into another disaster and occupations by first Nazis and later Soviet communists. Her land was again taken. One part of northern Hungary was then transferred from Czechoslovakia and became part of the Soviet Union and is today part of the Ukraine.

The maps not only show graphically the extent to which the Treaty of Trianon dismembered Hungary, it shows how much Hungarian-majority areas were arbitrarily "reassigned." Hungarians today are the one of the largest minorities in Europe and face oppression and violence. Numbering in the millions, Hungarian minorities are second only to the Russians who became "minorities" with the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Hungarians live under harsh persecution in the new states created by the treaty. The Helsinki Watch Committee called Romanian efforts to "purify" Transylvania as "Cultural Genocide."

6.05.2007

Fidesz in Hungary



Issue Watch Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research

Fidesz Stable at the Top in Hungary

May 28, 2007

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Public support for the opposition Hungarian Citizens Party (Fidesz) remains high in the European country, according to a poll by Tarki. 31 per cent of respondents would support Fidesz in the next election to the National Assembly, up one point since March.

The governing Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) is second with 19 per cent, followed by the Hungarian Democratic Forum (MDF) with five per cent, and the Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ) with three per cent.

Hungarian voters renewed their National Assembly in April 2006. The MSZP and the SZDSZ secured 210 of the legislative branch’s 386 seats, securing a full term for Socialist prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsany. Fidesz, led by Viktor Orban, elected 164 lawmakers. In June 2006, Gyurcsany introduced a fiscal "austerity package" of state subsidy reductions and tax increases, aimed at lowering the country’s fiscal deficit.

In September, Gyurcsany was criticized after Hungary’s state radio aired portions of an audiotape—which had been recorded in May—in which he told members of the MSZP that his administration "lied throughout the past one and a half or two years" about the state of the country’s economy in order to win re-election. The prime minister’s words sparked a two-week riot that threatened to end his government.

Earlier this month, National Police chief Laszlo Bene and Budapest Police chief Peter Gergenyi were fired, and justice and law enforcement minister Jozsef Petretei tendered his resignation, after some police officers were accused of serious offences, including rape, theft and bribery.

Gyurcsany discussed the situation, saying, "The recent events, regardless of the legal outcome, first prompted a political debate which has become a wider social debate because they have dented the confidence in the police." Albert Takacs, a former deputy ombudsman for human rights, was appointed to supplant Petretei.

Polling Data

Which party would you vote for in the next legislative election?

May 2007

Mar. 2007

Feb. 2007

Hungarian Citizens Party (Fidesz)

31%

30%

26%

Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP)

19%

19%

20%

Hungarian Democratic Forum (MDF)

5%

4%

4%

Alliance of Free Democrats (SZDSZ)

3%

3%

2%

Source: Tarki
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 Hungarian voters, conducted from May 7 to May 14, 2007. Margin of error is 3.1 per cent.

Válságos helyzetben az Ó-Pusztaszeri Emlékpark.



Válságos helyzetben az Ó-Pusztaszeri Emlékpark.

Az alábbi cikket a Los Angeles-i Amerikai Magyar Hírlap Vol. 19, Issue 23. számából vettem át.

„Válságos helyzetbe került a látogatószám csökkenése miatt az Ó-Pusztaszeri Nemzeti Történeti Emlékpark.

Horváth Gábor, a park igazgatója az emlékhelyet működtető közhasznú társaság taggyűlésén elmondta: évek óta folyamatosan csökken a látogatók száma, tavaly már csak 200 ezer ember kereste fel a parkot.

Az igazgató hozzátette: a normatív állami támogatás nélkül működő intézmény bevételeinek 80 százaléka a jegyértékesítésből származik, ezért a látogatószám csökkenése a működőképességet veszélyezteti. Horváth Gábor szólt arról is, hogy a Feszty-körkép épülete is felújításra szorul, a tetőzet nagyon rossz állapotban van, és egy nagyobb vihar bármikor megrongálhatja azt.

A park vezetője hangsúlyozta: a felújítás 200 millió forintba kerülne, és meg kellene oldani az épület szigetelését, valamint akadálymentesítését is, az ehhez szükséges forrásokat azonban az emlékpark nem tudja önmaga előteremteni.

A 37 éve létesített emlékhely közhasznú társaságként működik, többségi -- csaknem 80 százalékos -- tulajdonosa a Csongrád Megyei Önkormányzat. A kisebbségi tulajdonosok között a többi között vannak a szegedi és az ópusztaszeri önkormányzat, valamint a környezetvédelmi és az oktatási tárca is.

A hagyomány szerint a honfoglaló magyar törzsek vezetői Ó Pusztaszeren osztották ki a törzsi szálláshelyeket, azaz itt volt az első országgyűlés. Ennek tiszteletére és emlékére épült fel az emlékpark.

Olyan múzeum együttes épült, amely régészeti, történeti művelődéstörténeti , képzőművészeti, természettudományos és néprajzi gyűjteményeit, kiállításait élményt adó programokkal , szórakozást szolgáló rendezvényekkel is kiegészíti.

Állandó kiállítások: Feszty Árpád: „A magyarok bejövetele, Promenád 1896”, Szer monostora és kora, Romkert, Szabadtéri Néprajzi Múzeum, Az erdő és a ember, Világmagyarság hajléka.”

Hogyan lehet megközelíteni:

Vonattal a Kiskunfélegyházai állomás után Kisteleknél kell leszállni. Kistelekről busz megy ki Ó Pusztaszerre. Az út megjárható egy nap alatt ott alvás nélkül. Az utolsó busz vissza Kistelekre délután megy. Ezt elmulasztva a vonatcsatlakozás is kétségessé válhat.

Élmény:

Amerikából két fiatal Amerikai születésű rokonomat vittem el a parkba. Nagy élmény volt, és kiváló alkalom történelmi ízelítőt adni. Ne hagyjuk elveszni...

Válság:

Nagy veszteség lenne, ha a parkot be kellene zárni. Nemzettörténeti szempontokat azt hiszem szükségtelen részleteznem. Feltételezem a világ magyarsága adományokkal sokban tudna segíteni, ha a Közhasznú Társaság vezetőségével felvennék a kapcsolatot.

Aki még nem járt ott:

Több mint 270 képem megtekinthető a Web-Albumomban a következő címen:

http://picasaweb.google.com/leloed A megjelenő központi képre kattintva...

Honlapjaim:

http://www.arpad.com/

http://www.arpad1.com/

Elérhetőségem

Eloedl@Charter.Net

BLOG Oldalam

http://Arpad1.Blogspot.Com/

Using web feeds (RSS)



Using web feeds (RSS)

Here are answers to some common questions about using feeds (RSS).

What is a feed?

A feed, also known as RSS feed, XML feed, syndicated content, or web feed, is frequently updated content published by a website. It is usually used for news and blog websites, but can also be used for distributing other types of digital content, including pictures, audio or video. Feeds can also be used to deliver audio content (usually in MP3 format) which you can listen to on your computer or MP3 player. This is referred to as podcasting.

How do I know if a website offers feeds?

When you first view a website, Internet Explorer will search for feeds. If feeds are available, the Feeds button will change color and a sound will play.

How do I view a feed?

When you visit a webpage, the Feeds button will change color, letting you know that feeds are available. Click the Feeds button, and then click the feed you want to see. To get content automatically, you should subscribe to a feed. Click Related Topics to learn how to subscribe to a web feed.

How does a feed differ from a website?

A feed can have the same content as a webpage, but it's often formatted differently. When you subscribe, Internet Explorer automatically checks the website and downloads new content so you can see what is new since you last visited the feed.

How can I automatically get updated content?

You can receive content automatically by subscribing to a web feed. When you subscribe to a web feed, you set the interval at which Internet Explorer will check the website for updates. Once you've set an interval, Internet Explorer will automatically download the most up-to-date web feed list. Click Related Topics to learn how to subscribe to a web feed.

Does a feed subscription cost money?

No, it's usually free to subscribe to a feed.

How can I view my subscribed feeds?

You view feeds on the Feeds tab in the Favorites Center. To view your feeds, click the Favorites Center button , and then click Feeds.

Can other programs display my subscribed feeds?

Yes, Internet Explorer provides the Common Feed List to other programs. This allows you to subscribe to feeds with Internet Explorer and read them in other programs, such as e-mail clients.

What does RSS mean?

RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication, and is used to describe the technology used in creating feeds.

What formats do feeds come in?

The most common formats are RSS and Atom. Feed formats are constantly being updated with new versions. Internet Explorer supports RSS 0.91, 1.0, and 2.0, and ATOM .3, 1.0. All web feed formats are based on XML (Extensible Markup Language), a text-based computer language used to describe and distribute structured data and documents.

4.03.2007

„Három évet kaphat, aki fiatalnak kínál pénzt szexért cserébe

In a message dated 4/3/2007 11:47:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, vet@praemium.ro writes:

Hol vagytok püspökök?!

A kérdés puszta felvetése is lépésre kényszerítette az Országgyûlést

Az alábbi hír többek között a Hírszerzõn olvasható, mely szerint az Országgyûlés döntött:

„Három évet kaphat, aki fiatalnak kínál pénzt szexért cserébe

319 igen, ellenszavazat és tartózkodás nélkül elfogadta az Országgyûlés, a Büntetõ Törvénykönyv (BTK) módosítását. A hétfõn elfogadott változtatások szerint már azért is 3 éves börtönbüntetést lehet kapni, ha valaki 14 év és 18 év közötti fiatalnak pénzt kínál szexuális szolgáltatásért cserébe.

A pornográf felvételekkel kapcsolatos szabályozást már a múlt héten szigorította az Országgyûlés, eszerint aki 18. életévét be nem töltött személyrõl készít pornográf felvételt, az minden esetben vétséget követ el, és több év börtönbüntetést is kaphat."

Csak emlékeztetõül: az MVSZ pár nappal ezelõtt sajtótájékoztatón jelentette be, hogy többek közt népszavazást kezdeményez a gyermekpornográfia tiltása és büntetése érdekében az alábbi kérdésben:

Egyetért-e azzal, hogy törvény tiltsa és büntesse a kiskorúakkal kapcsolatos mindennemû pornográfiát?

Alig pár nap és az Országgyûlés meghozta a kérdésnek megfelelõ törvényt. S a református püspökök csendben vannak ahelyett, hogy gratulálnának az MVSZ-nek, és egyidõben felszólítanák az Országgyûlést az állampolgársági törvény haladéktalan megalkotására is.

Okos Márton

(2442/070403)

Tájékoztató hírleveleink küldését bármely címrõl a feladónak küldött "Lemondás" tárgyú üres levéllel lehet leállítatni, illetve a levélben megjelölt idõtartamra felfüggesztetni.

Ha van rá lehetõsége, küldje tovább hírleveleinket barátai, rokonai, ismerõsei e-mail címére. Ezzel is segíti a Magyarok Világszövetsége munkáját.

MVSZ Sajtószolgálat